When the a female erred in her own menstrual records, she may end upwards that have sexual interactions during the a taboo date

When the a female erred in her own menstrual records, she may end upwards that have sexual interactions during the a taboo date

When the a female erred in her own menstrual records, she may end upwards that have sexual interactions during the a taboo date

Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days Farmers dating site she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”

Amoraim could not argument tannaitic rulings as opposed to tannaitic service even so they composed fences in the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins

It statement by the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi generally got rid of most of the menstruating girls regarding normal monthly period category and you may place her or him regarding the abnormal updates off zava since the majority regular periods history at least 3 days. Seem to their question is that given the advanced clarifications had a need to select when one is niddah and if one may feel a good zava, one you are going to started to make a mistake with grievous consequences. Initial the new decree got minimal impression; it seems to have become local, and may also was basically limited to situations where question is actually involved as well as the local society was not well enough learned to decide during the like products ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Yes it wasn’t a general decree for everybody out of Israel, however it try the initial step because recommendations. In the first a few advice, Rabbi’s declaration deals with a woman just who could be a small zava or possibly a beneficial niddah. She is managed in the first situation because the good niddah, having a good 7-big date period of impurity, instead of someday regarding impurity during the day of bleeding, which is the signal to own a small zava. Regarding the 2nd analogy the woman is treated because an effective niddah and a zava whether your first-day had been in her ziva several months (brand new eleven weeks between monthly period symptoms). In the third problem, she is treated as a whole zava. Most of the about three rulings take the more stringent condition.

Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )

Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.

Tinggalkan Balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *